Today, cities and towns across the Commonwealth received the Governor’s support with the signing of a bill to finance municipal road and bridge improvements. The Senate and House sent a bill to the Governor Baker which provides $200 million in support for construction of road-related local priorities.
We have structured this bill to guarantee access to funding for each community in the state; Senator Tarr was happy to offer his support of this legislation- the Chapter 90 bill, during the Senate debate. Empowering local leaders to have the authority set priorities for their own communities in road projects is achieved in the new law.
Thursday, May 4, 2017
Wednesday, May 3, 2017
In Cod We Trust
Today, the Senate met for the first time in a new temporary space while the Senate Chamber undergoes major renovations expected to finish in more than a year. Tradition holds that we should not meet without the presence of a cod – today we took action and upheld that custom as we began a new session in Gardner Auditorium.
Senator Tarr has been exploring the possibility of moving the brass cod that hangs above the chandelier once the chamber remodeling begins. Until that occurs we were facing a cod deficit until Senator Joan Lovely of Salem offered Senator Tarr a cod worthy of the cause, and he placed it in a suitable [lace above the Senate’s temporary rostrum.
Chief Court Officer Paul Dooley will keep the cod safe under lock and key while the Senate is out of session.
The first significant industry in the early history of Massachusetts was fishing the Atlantic. Gloucester is the oldest fishing port in America and our state continues to have a strong connection with the sea.
The importance of maritime commerce was so significant that the Senate Chamber of the State House, where the House of Representatives met from 1798 to 1895, was always adorned with a five foot long carved wooden codfish – “the sacred cod”. When the House moved to a new chamber, the Senate took up the space and added its own fish often referred to as “the holy mackerel” – though it is in fact a cod.
More than a century before the founding of our nation Massachusetts citizens sent representatives to what was then, and now, called the General Court. Established in 1630 under the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the General Court is now in its 190th two year session. God save the cod.
Senator Tarr has been exploring the possibility of moving the brass cod that hangs above the chandelier once the chamber remodeling begins. Until that occurs we were facing a cod deficit until Senator Joan Lovely of Salem offered Senator Tarr a cod worthy of the cause, and he placed it in a suitable [lace above the Senate’s temporary rostrum.
Chief Court Officer Paul Dooley will keep the cod safe under lock and key while the Senate is out of session.
The first significant industry in the early history of Massachusetts was fishing the Atlantic. Gloucester is the oldest fishing port in America and our state continues to have a strong connection with the sea.
The importance of maritime commerce was so significant that the Senate Chamber of the State House, where the House of Representatives met from 1798 to 1895, was always adorned with a five foot long carved wooden codfish – “the sacred cod”. When the House moved to a new chamber, the Senate took up the space and added its own fish often referred to as “the holy mackerel” – though it is in fact a cod.
More than a century before the founding of our nation Massachusetts citizens sent representatives to what was then, and now, called the General Court. Established in 1630 under the Massachusetts Bay Colony, the General Court is now in its 190th two year session. God save the cod.
Tuesday, April 25, 2017
Senate Republican Caucus Offers Crime Lab Audit Law
Boston- Senate Republicans today announced a bill to detect and prevent the mishandling of forensic evidence in the state’s crime laboratory. The bill, written in the wake of more than 21,000 dismissed drug convictions connected to former state chemist Annie Dookhan, will safeguard the accuracy and integrity of lab procedures and results.
“The justice system was compromised because a so-called scientist with falsified credentials lied about her work for years. We all want to make certain that those responsible for maintaining the integrity of criminal evidence have proper oversight,” said Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr (R– Gloucester). “Accountability and accuracy are essential in every aspect of government and we know that many people were falsely convicted of crimes and others who may have been guilty were let free. We aim to empower state officials with the authority to conduct audits and reviews of the crime lab so that this doesn’t happen again.”
The state’s Supreme Judicial Court recently ruled that cases tainted by Dookhan would be dismissed or re-prosecuted. The discredited chemist falsified her academic credentials and admitted in court to intentionally contaminating evidence in an effort to rack up higher lab results, she was convicted of 27 charges in 2013 including for perjury, obstruction of justice, and altering evidence.
The court’s action would require prosecutors to show that they could secure convictions in retrials without using evidence handled or contaminated by Dookhan. The court’s action comes too late for some who were sentenced because they have already served out their prison terms.
“Annie Dookhan’s mishandling of criminal lab evidence was a travesty. Investigations into her actions and her conviction brought to light serious gaps in the management and oversight within the crime lab,” said Senator Ross (R-Wrentham), ranking Republican member of the Judiciary Committee. “A thoroughly conducted triennial review of procedures used in crime labs is necessary to take preventative measures against misconduct and abuse of the justice system.”
A 15-month investigation by Inspector General Glenn Gunha which concluded in a 2014 report found that lax lab management failed to detect the actions of Dookan. The report identified important reforms which have been undertaken such as requiring crime lab facilities to meet national accreditation standards.
“Since the issues of evidence tainting have been identified, the State Police have assumed control of the labs and they have worked effectively to reform the way the labs operate,” said Tarr. “The work of they are doing is commendable, and it needs to be supported with every tool available. Audits have been proven to be effective tools, and we should make sure they are done regularly because the consequences of evidence tainting are just too negative for the integrity of our criminal justice system.”
Sponsors of the bill propose requiring the Executive Office of Public Safety’s Forensic Sciences Advisory Board to initiate a comprehensive audit of all laboratories providing forensic service for the state by September 1st of this year. The state Inspector General, in collaboration with the state Auditor, would be directed to initiate such an audit to ensure the accuracy and integrity of lab work every three years.
The Forensic Sciences Advisory Board is comprised of representatives from the District Attorneys Association, Massachusetts Chiefs of Police Association, the Commissioner of Public Health, the Massachusetts Organization of State Engineers and Scientists, members of bar associations, and others with expertise in forensic and biological sciences.
Senators expect the bill to gain bipartisan and bicameral support as it moves through the legislative process.
Friday, April 7, 2017
Senate Republican Caucus Acts to Protect Privacy of Internet Users
Boston-
In the wake of recent federal legislative changes allowing internet service
providers to use or sell browsing history and other information collected from
their customers, Senate Minority Leader Bruce Tarr (R-Gloucester) and the
Senate Republican Caucus are filing legislation to prevent that from happening
without the customer’s consent. The bill is titled, “An Act Ensuring Internet
Security and Privacy”.
On
April 3, 2017, federal legislation known as “S.J. Res. 34-A joint resolution
providing for congressional disapproval under chapter 8 of title 5, United
States Code, of the rules submitted by the Federal Communications Commission
relating to “Protecting the Privacy of Customers of Broadband and Other
Telecommunications Services,” became law, and as a result, regulations that had
been developed by the Federal Communications Commission during the Obama
Administration were prevented from going into effect. Those regulations would
have prevented internet service providers such as AT&T and Comcast from
collecting and selling customer information without permission. Consequently,
such practices are permissible and unregulated.
“The
federal government has created a situation that threatens consumer privacy, and
it needs to be addressed,” said Tarr. He added that, “a customer of any of
these providers should have control of their personal information, and
shouldn’t have to pay for that control.”
“Consumer
privacy is an issue that is on the minds of many of my constituents, and it is
my hope that this legislation will address their serious concerns,” said
Senator Richard Ross (R-Wrentham).
“As
the reliance on web-based technology continues to extend into our day-to-day
lives, preserving consumer privacy is vital,” said Senator Don Humason
(R–Westfield). “This bill would provide Massachusetts residents with a
protection against the sale of their personal information.”
“This
bill is an important step in re-claiming the privacy rights of our
constituents,” said Senator Vinny deMacedo (R-Plymouth). “I look forward to
working with my colleagues in the Legislature to safeguard our constituents and
their privacy.”
“It
is important we protect consumer’s privacy, and to ensure their information is
not being sold to the highest bidder without their knowledge,” said Senator
Ryan Fattman (R-Webster).
“This
recent act of congress infringes on our basic rights to privacy, and in an age
of increasing dependency on internet trade, consumers’ rights must be
protected,” said Senator Patrick O’Connor (R-Weymouth). “This bill will act as
a safeguard for Massachusetts residents and their personal information.”
The
new bill, if enacted into law, would specifically prohibit the collection and
dissemination of a consumer’s personal information without the written consent
of the consumer. It would also prohibit any charge from being imposed on a
consumer that did not provide such consent.
The
bill has been filed and being offered for co-sponsorship to all members of the
House and Senate.
A copy of the text of the bill can be found here: https://malegislature.gov/Bills/190/S2053
###
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)